Film critic Manohla
Dargis of the New York Times wrote a
review on Les Miserables which
appeared on December 24th, 2012. Dargis begins her review by
focusing on Anne Hathaway’s performance. I agree that Hathaway’s performance is
incredible; she portrays Fantine as the martyr figure she is and does so by
emotionally attaching herself to the character. Hathaway’s performance of “I
Dreamed a Dream” is one of the main highlights of this rendition of Les Miserables. Viewers cannot take
their eyes off of her during this scene. Dargis points out that the “artful
grunge” on the actors is distracting, but it adds an aspect of reality to the
film considering it takes place in early 19th century France; the
characters sporting dirt are members of the impoverish lower class who have
nothing but the clothes on their backs. Dargis also throws an insult at
director Tom Hooper when she writes, “This [“I Dreamed a Dream”] is one number in which he
doesn’t try to upstage his performers.”
Dargis makes sure she gives some background information
on the musical. The information she provides is relevant and interesting to
readers. She spends two paragraphs mentioning the awards Les Miserables has received, moments in which some of the songs have
been sung (like when Susan Boyle sang “I Dreamed a Dream” on Britain’s Got Talent), and Victor Hugo,
who wrote the novel Les Miserables
that the musical is based upon.
Key points of the film are pointed out in Dargis’ review
such as the way the film begins. Dargis cleverly writes about Jean Valjean
(Hugh Jackman) and how he is portrayed as a Christ figure in the beginning of
the film when he is carrying the cumbersome flagpole. Hooper focuses on
Christianity in Les Miserables and
makes it a key theme in the film. Dargis expresses that Les Miserables is a “story of oppression, liberation and redemption,”
which is true. Every character carries his or her cross, from Valjean trying to
find worth in his life after being a prisoner to the prison guard Javert (Russell
Crowe) struggling with internal conflict of his own. Redemption is suggested at
the end of the film when the cast is singing on a “ship” made from furniture.
I agree with Dargis
when she writes that Hooper’s choice of having the songs sung live rather than
prerecorded is extremely beneficial. If Anne Hathaway lip sang “I Dreamed a
Dream,” it would not have compared to her heart-rending live rendition. The
actors’ expressions are put under a microscope in which the audience can see
their varying emotions while singing. The camera enhances these emotional songs
by focusing on the actors’ expressions (like Hathaway trembling).
After praising most
aspects of the movies, Dargis’ review makes a turn for the worst when she writes
Les Miserables lacks spark. She
expresses that Hooper’s camera angles are what destroy the movie because he is
always “hurtling
or throwing the camera around.” She suggests viewers may wait for the movie to
end out of impatience (she thinks relationships and rebellion are not enhanced
in the film), but in reality, the film is just extremely long. Despite its
length, I think Les Miserables is a
must-see film. Although Dargis’ review contains distracting grammatical errors
and slaps Les Miserables with
undeserved critiques, she does provide a different opinion of the film.
Does the reviewer say whether this is an adaptation meant to draw everyone to the theater or is it meant for fans of the broadway play?
ReplyDelete